|
|
BELOW
AVERAGE
|
AVERAGE
|
ABOVE
AVERAGE
|
| TECHNICAL SKILLS |
|
|
ATTENTION TO DETAIL
|
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
CODING
|
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| ALPHABETIZING
& FILING |
xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| MANUAL
DEXTERITY |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| MECHANICAL
COMPREHENSION |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| PRECISION |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| DIMENSION |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| PARTS |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| TOOLS |
xxx |
| INTERPERSONAL
SKILLS |
|
| PEOPLE
CONTACT DESIRED |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| EMOTIONAL
STABILITY |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| WARMTH |
xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| REASONING |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| DOMINANCE |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| RULE-CONSCIOUSNESS |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| SOCIAL
BOLDNESS |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| SENSITIVITY |
xxx |
| ABSTRACTEDNESS |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| PRIVATENESS |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| SELF-ASSURANCE |
xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| OPENNESS TO
CHANGE |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| SELF-RELIANCE |
xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| PERFECTIONISM |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| EXTRAVERSION |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| INDEPENDENCE |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| SELF-CONTROL |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
TECHNICAL
SKILLS
Attention to Detail
Attention to detail measures the candidate's ability to scan and locate details
in words, numbers and symbols rapidly, and to recognize likenesses and
differences quickly. A superior score would be 30 or more, therefore with a
score of 21 this candidate exhibited high
average ability in this area.
Coding
Coding is a test designed to measure the candidate's skills in coding numbers
and letters. This candidate scored 136,
which was superior. A superior score
is evaluated as 121 or higher.
Alphabetizing & Filing
This test was designed to evaluate the candidate's ability to handle files, file
retrieval, manipulation of files by storing them in alphabetical order, and
sorting lists of words. This candidate was below
average with a score of 45,
whereas a superior score is 96 or higher.
Manual Dexterity
This test measures a person's aptitude for fine and gross muscle control,
dexterity and eye-hand coordination. A
superior score is 199 or more. This candidate was far
above average, scoring 198.
Mechanical Comprehension
Mechanical Comprehension measures the ability to perceive and understand the
relationship of physical forces and mechanical elements in practical situations.
This candidate was in the 99th percentile,
which is superior. To achieve a
superior rating, the candidate must score in the 95th percentile or higher.
Precision
Precision tests the candidate's aptitude to recognize likenesses and differences
of objects or pictures. This candidate achieved an above average score of 40.
A superior score is 45 or higher.
Dimension
This test measures a
person's aptitude for spatial relations. A score of 42 or more is superior,
therefore this candidate was far above
average with a score of 39.
Parts
Parts tests a person's layout and organizational ability. This candidate showed low
average performance by scoring 32.
A superior score is 46 or more.
Tools
This test measures the candidate's knowledge of simple tools and mechanical
equipment. A score of 44 or more is superior. This person was extremely
poor by scoring 14.
INTERPERSONAL SKILLS
C.P.F. (Ability to Work
With People)
C.P.F. measures the
candidate's desire for daily people contact on-the-job. A person who scores in
the average range prefers a job with an equal mix of people contact and
administrative work. A superior score is 29 or higher. Therefore with a score of
20, this candidate displayed a high
average desire for people contact.
N.P.F. (Emotional Stability)
N.P.F. measures a
person's emotional stability, responsibility and resistance to stress. This
candidate exhibited low average
emotional stability with a score of 15
as opposed to a superior score of 29 or higher. Groups constituted by persons of
high average stability, or more, generally make strong teams, trusting one
another and free from manifestation of panic and low morale.
16
P.F. (5th Edition)
Mr. Smith
appears to be a reserved individual, who may be cautious about forming personal
attachments. However, he prefers working in teams, and may not be at his best in
situations where he must function independently, even though he is a "take
charge" kind of person. This candidate tends to focus more on the practical
than the abstract, and may not take the feelings of others into consideration in
his decision-making.
Mr. Smith seems to be goal-oriented and self-disciplined, and will be very
effective in organized and structured situations, but may find it hard to deal
with the unpredictable. He can be expected to be conscientious and conform to
conventional norms. He appears to possess high average reasoning skills.
Recommendation
With
an overall weighted aggregate score of 66%, Mr. Smith is recommended for
hire provided that further supervised training is available. He may not
be as well organized as would be desirable. As well, he did not
demonstrate the knowledge of simple tools and equipment that would be
expected of a warehouse employee.
Mr. Smith is somewhat reserved and appears to be sufficiently
self-motivated so that this will not hinder him from achieving his
personal or organizational goals. Since this candidate is
straightforward, and displayed little tendency to tell his superiors what
they want to hear, his striving for perfection, goal attainment,
discipline and independence are all very positive. If hired, he should be
encouraged to be more outgoing, flexible, and attuned to the feelings of
others.
