| | Project Leader Skills Evaluation
 |
Author:
Bruce A. Winrow |
 |
Date
introduced: 2000 |
 |
Administration
time: 1 hour 10 minutes |
 |
Booklet and Internet versions available |
Purpose
To
evaluate the suitability of candidates for the position of Project
Leader, by measuring essential skills including business judgment,
supervisory practices, problem solving and knowledge of project
organization, control, scheduling and planning concepts.
General
Description
The
Project Leader Skills Evaluation (1-hour Version) consists of five problems. In
problem 1, (approximately 8 minutes), the candidate must answer six questions
that evaluate generally accepted project leadership practices. Problem 2
(approximately 15 minutes) requires the individual to analyze a business
situation and develop a structured problem solving approach. Problem 3
(approximately 8 minutes) consists of six questions about common working
situations that determine the test-taker’s general business judgment. Problem
4 (approximately 8 minutes) examines the candidate’s supervisory abilities. In
problem 5 (approximately 30 minutes), the individual must analyze a project plan
to determine such issues as estimated time of completion, slack, and manpower
requirements.
Positions
for which the test is appropriate
 |
Project
Leaders
|
 |
Project
Managers
|
 |
Business
Analysts
|
 |
Systems
Analysts
|
Job
criteria measured
 | Identifying
key activities and sequencing them properly to ensure attainment of project
goals.
|
 |
Ability
to organize daily activities on a priority basis.
|
 |
Skill
in solving problems in a structured and controlled manner.
|
 |
Ability
to understand common business practices, and ability to respond to various
customer service situations.
|
 |
Ability
to supervise team members.
|
 |
Understanding
of basic project management theory.
|
 |
Ability
to use networking for planning, evaluating, and controlling the progress of
activities in a project environment.
|
Test
administration
The test
requires only clerical supervision to administer. Once begun, it is
self-instructive for candidates, requiring 1 hour to complete.
Sample
question (segment)
CREDIBLE
CAR CORP. marketed several lines of auto parts throughout the United States.
They recently installed a new computer system-order entry and billing. Much to
everyone's embarrassment, the invoices were consistently wrong, resulting in a
disastrous effect on the company's reputation for quality and accuracy.
Mr. Smith, the Marketing Manager, talked to the systems and operations managers
about this problem. "How could you fellows have made such a blunder?"
he asked. "Didn't you test those systems? This failure will cost us
plenty."
The Systems man smiled. "It's your mistake," he said. "Remember
last year that fellow Smith, who is responsible for Customer Liaison, wanted to
take over some applications. He claimed that the marketing people knew more
about how customers react to such systems than anyone. Besides, those simple
systems were very easy to buy - you could get them right off the shelf. He's
your man, and this is your mistake."
Smith was surprised to find out that his inside sales representative was
responsible for such systems. Upon checking, he found that his sales
representative had made this agreement over a year ago with the people in
systems. His man Smith was eager to make his name in the company, and he tended
to take up whatever responsibilities he could. The agreement had been concluded
several levels below Mr. Smith, and he had merely concurred at the time. Mr.
Smith had argued that it is reasonable for the marketing people to choose simple
systems, because they often make the difference between consumer acceptance and
failure. Moreover, systems and operations often choose over-expensive,
over-systematized programs for the consumer goods division, reflecting their
interest in the computer, not sales.
If YOU were hired to deal with this problem, what five key steps (ranked in
priority order) would you take to ultimately rectify the situation?
Sample Candidate Evaluation Report
Click here to view a sample detailed evaluation report.
Evaluation
The overall rating
is based on scores according to the following table:
| Score |
Rating |
Recommendation |
| 75-100% |
Above Average |
We strongly recommend this
individual as having the potential for a successful career as a project leader. |
| 60-74% |
Average |
We recommend this individual for
the position of project leader provided further supervised training is supplied. |
| 48-59% |
Satisfactory |
We recommend this individual for
the position of project leader only if highly motivated and if an intensive, well
supervised training course is available. |
| 0-47% |
Below Average |
We DO NOT recommend this
individual for the position of project leader. |
Validation Information
May,
2000:
Given
the demonstrated relationship between the abilities and traits required to
perform the ten key tasks of the Project Leader incumbent, and those measured by
the Project Leader Skills Evaluation (1-Hour), the test represents a content
valid evaluation device for those positions.
Languages
published
 | English |
|